Gunomeria Schmiedeknecht, 1907
Gunomeria macrodactylus (Holmgren, 1856)
Gunomeria sordida (Gravenhorst, 1829)
The two species were treated as synonyms by Yu and Horstmann (1997) and Townes (1970) stated that there was only a single species. Horstmann (2008) separated the two species largely on the basis of sculpture and color.
Biology is unknown.
Additional characteristics given by Townes (1970) are shared by some species in both Mesoleptidea and Hadrodactylus: ventral tooth of mandible slightly larger and longer than dorsal tooth; dorsal end of epicnemial carina extending to anterior margin of mesopleuron, and propodeum generally smooth, with median longitudinal carinae varying in length among species.
There are no specimens currently determined for this OTU, or those specimens determined for this OTU are not yet mappable.
This work would not have been possible without the groundwork provided by Ian Gauld’s study of the Australian and Costa Rican faunas, and we are particularly grateful for his assistance in many aspects of this study. We also thank David Wahl of the American Entomological Institute for the opportunity to examine material in the AEI collection relevant to this page as well as for useful feedback throughout our study. Matt Yoder provided considerable assistance with databasing issues, and our use of PURLs (http://purl.oclc.org) in this regard follows the example of their use in publications by Norm Johnson. Heather Cummins, Caitlin Nessner, and Karl Roeder graciously assisted us with formatting and literature retrieval. This study was supported by the National Science Foundation’s PEET program under Grant No. DEB 0328922 and associated REU supplement nos DEB 0616851, 0723663, and 0923134.
This material is based upon work at Texas A&M University supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Number DEB 0328922 with REU supplements DEB 0616851, 0723663, and 0923134. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.